This review has two thumbs up.
Roger Ebert was the film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times for 56 years of his life, as some like to say half of the history of all cinema. Through his efforts in the industry, film criticism began to gain momentum earning a sort of prestige for the job that made or broke films. Studios went from loving critics, to hating them, to fearing them- a natural progression which today is still followed. One of Ebert's greatest successes was his popular TV show with fellow critic Gene Siskel entitled At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. Pulitzer prize in hand, each week Roger would go to bat against Siskel in debating films. Their opposing personalities led to natural confrontation which added a different sort of interest to the show. Together, they developed a system of rating movies by giving thumbs up or down to evaluate the quality of the film. "Two thumbs up for this one" is a phrase now integrated into reviewing films. His words started so many careers, and his personality bolstered so many young film makers as they slowly entered into the good old boys club of Hollywood. In his later years, Roger developed cancer which slowly ate away at him taking with it his ability to speak and move. Through his surgery and rehab, Roger continued to write reviews for the Chicago-Sun. His combative personality mixed with his love for the industry made him a valued and important figure among the Hollywood Elite.
I don't consider what I do film criticism. I just like to watch movies, and as per routine I suggest them to the vast emptiness known as the internet. I don't keep up to date with new films; I rarely ever watch ones with subtitles; I never give you one I don't like. It's important to have people like Ebert who can weed out the not so great films in Hollywood so that the important ones can shine and continue the perpetual motion known as entertainment.