Sunday, June 29, 2014

Capture of Culture- Unlocking Sherlock

You've heard of the stories before. I am sure. He's that detective with a deerstalker hat and the pipe hanging from the right side of his mouth. His personality and mannerisms are quite rude in nature, yet all of the world seems to be charmed by him. He deduces, and as a collective we stand back and marvel at what his eyes can see while we silently try to get a step ahead of him. He is Sherlock Holmes. And more recently, his most popular performance comes from the BBC production "Sherlock".


Sherlock is the classic fan-boy reinvention of the novel series by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sherlock Holmes is set in modern day London away from the "fog of the Victorian era" so that his skills and personality are better understood by modern audiences. The two writers, Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss, were boy hood detective lovers who came together to write this modern interpretation of the Holmes story. In this behind the scenes peek, the two writers sit down and talk about not only their process for writing and directing the cast, but also about the history of Sherlock Holmes as a literary and screen character. Doyle's novels became incredibly popular in the early 1900's and were serialized in England. By the end of his career, their were 4 novels and over 50 short stories that featured Sherlock Holmes and his trusty sidekick Dr. John Watson. Since then, there have been countless film adaptations of the stories. Ever since film became a medium of story telling there have been Sherlocks to watch. Many of which were popular during the life of the original author. By taking all of these references into consideration, Moffat and Gatiss were able to come up with their comprehensive cast of characters and stories that, to date, have made three seasons worth of suspense and intrigue.


As discussed in the documentary, Sherlock Holmes is a most difficult man and character to get across to an audience. He is not a pleasant man, yet audiences must connect with him in order to follow his lead through the many crime scenes he enters. He must be erratic and over conscious of his own intellect and power, but he also must be internally very emotional hence Irene Adler and the violin playing. But in short, he is an obsessive being, who lives for the chase and finds himself utterly lost in boredom when he is not on the case. In the modern update it was important to the writers to show that Sherlock had his addictions, but not to over emphasis them as so many had done before. The character of Sherlock Holmes was a cocaine and morphine user. Only used when bored, of course, but nevertheless his drug habits were often very prominent in previous adaptations. In Sherlock, Sherlock uses nicotine to stimulate his senses, but he does not use it as a crutch like so many others would lead the viewers to believe.


Another vastly important and prominent character in this adaptation is that of Watson. The good doctor who is more patient than any other person in conjunction with Sherlock and is the only one who open marvels at his abilities and talents for deduction. As Martin Freeman puts it, Watson is the embodiment of the audience. He reacts the way we do; some days he stands in awe of Sherlock's talents and others he is completely baffled by his ignorance and arrogance towards the rest of common society. Moffat and Gatiss made the conscience decision to make Watson a co-lead in their series, a trend which started after an infamous performance by actor Nigel Bruce in the 14 film serial of the 1940s. Ever since his comical interpretation of the character, Watson became an integral part of the Sherlock story, even though without him the story wouldn't have ever existed he had fallen by the wayside in film adaptations until this point. In this modern version he is the sanity behind the madman detective and a clear favorite of the viewing public.


Another integral character to the story of Sherlock Holmes is the actual law force of Scotland Yard. G. Lestrade is the lead detective that uses Sherlock's help in cases and is often portrayed as a more bumbling character because he is good, but he is also aware of the fact that he will never be as good as Sherlock. When the novels were being written, forensic science was just being born. Finger printing hadn't really been delved into as much as it could have been and deduction was used in the stead of science, which is why Sherlock was so invaluable to the force. But Sherlock, true to the original written form was a scientist in his own right. Modern versions of these stories tend to overlook that aspect of his investigation. Sherlock, in fact, only references it in passing with a dismembered hand or head in the fridge as part of an experiment rather than an active part of the narrative. Benedict Cumberbatch, the leading lad of Sherlock, explains that it's his self established authority on crime scenes that takes the audience a bit by surprise. We don't expect him to just take over; what gives him the right, but after the facts have been established it's Sherlock who is able to take the police force to the next step through his thought process and intelligence for all things murder related. It's rather morbid when you dwell on it.



This BBC documentary takes all the information of the characters and the past history of Sherlock Holmes and combines it into one, easy to digest, informative episode. Many of the actors get involved in the examination of their individual characters and the actual influences on their series as well as commentary from the directors, writers, and producers of Sherlock. Intermixed with the explanations is archived footage of various Sherlock Holmes films and series footage from the episodes in the first two seasons, as well as passage readings from the novels brought to the screen by co-writer Mark Gatiss. This is incredibly helpful in catching up if you have waited a while before revisiting the series. It is terrible, though, if you have never seen the episodes in order or have read the books well enough to know the story arches. The opening scene is the season 2 finale, which made many hearts drop when it premiered, but if you haven't seen it then you really shouldn't ruin your appetite with it here until you are ready. Once you jump into this little masterpiece of a series, it's rather hard to crawl your way back out.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Stream of the Week- Clue

There are not many films that I know of based solely on the idea of a board game. Come to think of it, not many board games are based on the act of murder. Somewhere, sometime, someone did something right.


Using all the characters and props of the popular board game, Clue is a movie that is a mystery surrounding the blackmail of 6 people and the murder of 6 related characters all within the time frame of 45 minutes in a house on a hill. Each of the guests were invited to the house by an unnamed host in regards to the blackmail that they had been pressured with for extended amounts of time. As each of the guests arrived they received a pseudonym to go by in the house as to not alert the other guests to who they were or how they were important. After a short wait and dinner, the guests were all introduced to another character by the name of Mr. Boddy. He, they assumed, was their blackmailer. Each of their wrongdoings was  unveiled to the group and chaos ensued as Mr. Boddy was quickly murdered. This led all the characters to accuse each other of the murder for they each had motive, but their accusations could not last long because another murder was quickly discovered. As the body count increases and the mystery heightens, the 6 guests and the butler roam around the house looking for other possible suspects or victims. By the end, we never really get to know what happens for sure because the film gives us three possible endings to choose from in this the quest of evidence.


This film has been a classic at my house for years and has always been well appreciated by everyone. There's humor, and action, murder and mystery, and an unbelievable plot and story. The set is simple and the cast limited in numbers which gives everyone a chance to develop their own character and present a diverse group of murderers. The jokes are surface funny, with an even deeper humor if one is willing to dwell on it longer and they are often repeated or referenced later in the script (mostly in groups of 3). The nice thing about this movie is that it's semi-lighthearted and not too scary though it deals with such a dark subject. In the end it doesn't really matter who murdered who. It's the journey together that entertains the audience.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Maleficent

Behind each Princess tale there is a form of a Fairy Godmother. There is also, undoubtedly, a villain. It is quite out of the ordinary for these two character forms to coincide within the same person.



Maleficent is the story of the evil Fairy who cursed little Sleeping Beauty to prick her finger and fall into a death-like sleep. Disney painted her as an evil woman who had no heart and very little patience for mankind. However, in this new Disney backstory, Maleficent is given a cause and a speck of compassion for little Princess Aurora. As a young girl, Maleficent was orphaned and lived in the enchanted wood. She met a human boy named Stefan, and they, in the Disney fashion, fell in love. Stefan, however, fell victim to the greed of man and left Maleficent for a position at the castle. Many years later, the king of men hears of a power growing in her enchanted forest and sends a force to destroy it. Maleficent defeats the king's men leaving the king to issue an order to seek vengeance on the Fairy of the forest. Stefan seizes the opportunity and seeks out Maleficent. He steals from her the beautiful wings which she loved. In order to seek her revenge, she visits Stefan as newly crowned king and curses his daughter Princess Aurora. As the child grows, Maleficent watches and waits. When the time comes for her 16th birthday, Maleficent attempts to take back her curse, only to find it cannot be undone.


This film was beautiful to watch. It's carefully crafted sets and characters have a dreamlike quality often associated with the franchise. Maleficent, true to her form, was very angular in her appearance between her horns and exaggerated cheekbones. The "magic" was all very fluid and the appearance was consistent, no matter how unbelievable it appeared.


The characters were a tad undeveloped. It was fascinating to find what drove Maleficent to be so evil, but the characters around her seemed unfinished and unrealistic in their performances. Angelina Jolie was both evil and sweet at the same time as she watched over Sleeping Beauty. She had several shining moments of wit or humor that really were great. Her scene at the celebration for the child when she bestows the curse is very well done. She is sarcastic and powerful in her performance which really sells the scene. There is even a cute moment when she meets Aurora as a child where Aurora is played by Angelina's daughter that is fantastic to watch if you know the relation. Aurora, however, is extremely dull as a character. She seems dimwitted and extremely unaware of her surroundings, almost like she is constantly stoned while being in the film. Her character brings down the film as does her father King Stefan.


Overall, this film was obviously a special effects project that lacked feeling and a real quality to it's performance. However, it was entertaining enough to hold audiences throughout it's duration, and that can be a feat in these changing times of cinema entertainment.



Friday, June 20, 2014

Stream of the Week-Beware of Christians and One Nation Under God

Beware of Christians


I am a Christian. Or at least I thought I was until I realized that being a Christian is more than just going to church or just believing in Christ. Beware of Christians is the journey of 4 college guys who struggle to find Christ in biased America. They go to Europe to find what the rest of the world thinks of Christianity and God.





In each of the cities the group goes to they focus on one subject. These subjects range from poverty and wealth to sex before marriage and God in entertainment. There are so many views that Americans have grown up with that are very different from the teachings of the Bible. These 4 boys discover what they should follow with their religion rather than what their peers tell them they should follow.


The questions brought up in this documentary are extremely valid, and though none of them get solved, they definitely make the viewer question their own beliefs in religion. The people that they meet in Europe and various locations teach them that the standards that they have been taught to live by are complete based on loose translations of the Bible and American traditions. In other countries, people claim that they cannot tell the difference between Christians and non-Christians based on their actions. This is contrary to what Americans believe should happen. We have let religion become routine rather than a fight for God on a daily basis.


This documentary is set up in an interview and journey vlog form, which has the main people discussing the events that occurred while filming and then show the actual clips of their adventures. The four guys are entertaining and have thought provoking ideas and statements that they present to the audience. Editing wise, it's rough and gritty which adds to the effect of the raw thoughts of the film.


One Nation Under God


This film is made by several of the same people that made Beware of Christians and is the prequel to that film. They go to various American cities and ask the simple question "Who was Jesus Christ?" The answers may surprise you. We live in a country which we are told is filled with Christians and believers, but these people give answers like "he was a white dude who made a film" and "I don't know, some guy". No one knows all the answers, and it's okay to admit it, but we have turned religion into an institution that can scare aware people who could be saved if we weren't so radical in our approach of God's word.


One of the men they interviewed talked about how you can't boil the Bible down to a bumper sticker. You can't just say Jesus was this guy the son of God. The purpose of life is not an easy thing to determine neither is the origin of religion or Jesus. The people they meet are insane, and the ideas they encounter are just as crazy.


Content wise, this documentary did not draw as deep of conclusions as it's sequel, Beware of Christians. It focused more on the boys' adventure than their discovery of Christianity, but the idea is similar- We have no idea what we are supposed to follow when it comes to God. Everyone has their own idea and set of beliefs. Somewhere in between all of them is the right answer.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

X-Men: Days of Future Past

Just when you thought they were done making films about Wolverine they made another one.


In Days of Future Past, Wolverine has his consciousness sent back to his old body from 1973 in order to warn the past mutants about the war that will occur 50 years in the future. His job is to find the Professor and Magneto in 1973 and get them to stop Mystique from killing the man who will use her DNA to make the soldiers that are killing the mutants in the future. Magneto is imprisoned, and the Professor is addicted to pain killers to stop his powers. Wolverine's job is difficult because Magneto and the Professor are on different sides of the mutant debate. Professor just wanted peace, whereas Magneto wants to fight for his brothers and sisters. They are brought together by their mutual care for Mystique. Once together they hunt her down and try to convince her that she is wrong, but their mission becomes difficult when their existence is made known to the public.


My problem with the X-Men franchise is the fact that the idea of the bad guy is always the same. Humans are bad and not understanding of the struggle of the mutants. Mutants are good and misunderstood. I have a problem that it's always the same. Magneto always comes across as the radical (kind of like Malcolm X during the Civil Rights movement) and the Professor is always for peace and harmony between the two races (much like Martin Luther King). What is nice about these films is that there is always some kind of historic or social subtext in the plot. For example, mutants are often treated as outsiders with a disease. It can be compared to the struggle between gays and super conservative people. It can also be compared to the treatment of the Jews during the Holocaust. In this film, mutants are corralled and experimented on. They are exterminated and piled up to be burned. They pull on historical references to help make the struggle more identifiable for the viewer.


There are quite a few issues with this film at least in my opinion. It was rather long with some really slow paced sequences. The first 10 minutes are rather confusing if you're not paying attention later. I had to explain what was going on to my mother and father because they were totally lost. The "future" scenes are also very dark in their coloring which can make it hard to see the action or understand the composition of the set and scene around the actors. This film has quite a few visual effects in it which allows the actors to use that as a crutch. Yes, I thought they all did a fine job, but they didn't have to give a fantastic performance because much of the scene would be altered later anyway to give constant action.


On the bright side, if you have seen the previous X-Men movies there are a lot of references for you to get. Even if you haven't seen them all or remember any of them, these references are easily presented so that no one can miss them. There are also some really great slow motion sequences with Quicksilver. He, by the way, is the best part of this film. His moments are humorous, while still carrying weight, and have great effects which still require him to put off a persona in his performance. Also, spoiler alert, no one actually dies by the end. No matter what happens in the "future" it can all be changed by the past. So all those deaths you felt semi-bad about in the "future" sequences get changed by the actions of the past.

Friday, June 13, 2014

Stream of the Week- Annie Hall

Sarcasm is a priceless gift; one which Woody Allen has most definitely been given.


Annie Hall is the story of Max and his love for a girl named Annie Hall. She was this amazing bright spot in his cynical sarcastic lifestyle. She brought him out of his shell and he brought her out of her room into the real world where she blossomed into a fantastic artist with great opinions and friends. Annie is the one that got away, and she is the one he'll never forget.


What I find so fantastic about this film is the clever witty writing that is so Woody Allen in nature. He has these asides to the audience in which he explains his dilemmas with Annie and discusses them with strangers on the street who only answer his questions with honesty. His comments are directed at the audience but are either asked rhetorically or answered by his own conscience in the strangers around him. Another factor which I found extremely entertaining is the nature of the background conversations that go on in group scenes. Woody Allen is basically making fun of the stereotypes and the people that exist in the time period. They act all openly self absorbed and talk with empty meaning. My absolute favorite scene is a real short one liner from Jeff Goldblum at a Hollywood party. He is just standing there as Annie and Max pass. The camera lingers, he picks up the phone, and says "Hello, I've lost my mantra." I just found it utterly hilarious and fantastic to watch.



Woody Allen acts like he would be in person. His jokes are highly sarcastic, often extremely cynical, and his tone is often 1 note, but it's his energy that makes those little one liners so funny. He's always on edge like he's nervous and he's always talking to people like everything is a joke. Annie on the other hand is very up front with her feelings and does not cover them up with humor like Max does. She is genuine and awkward, like most people are in their first relationships, but she quickly grows to own herself with the encouragement of Max.


There is a lot to learn about life and love from this film. Yes, it is a romantic comedy, but maybe in name only, because when you get down to it- Annie Hall is a lesson to everyone out there that mistakes are made and love can be fantastic.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Capture of Culture- Superheroes

I was unaware that there was an entire group of people that dress up in costume to go fight crime in the dead of night in their home cities. But crime does not sleep, so why should the citizens that are dedicated to protecting the people of Gotham....I mean the world.


It is a generally accepted fact that the various police and justice systems of the major cities of the USA are overrun with work. Often they are given the task of filling quotas. This leads to petty arrests and angers the "do-gooders" in society because they see "real" crimes go unpunished in their own communities. Based on these feelings, and their own personal love for superhero culture, individuals become their own alter egos and fight crime on their own. They adopt names, develop patterns and habits, and pick their routes. Many patrol their streets in the early mornings looking for justice offenders like muggers, rapists, and dealers. Legally they have no power, but they can call it in which can be ineffective, or they can make a citizen's arrest.


Several leagues have been created to bring together those real life superheroes. The Xtreme Justice League is a San Diego based group that at the time of this film only had one member. His goal is to protect his home and community by being a present force of Justice. (http://www.xtremejusticeleague.org/index.html) Another group is the New York Initiative. It consists of 4 members that use their team to bate criminals and then catch them in the act. (https://www.facebook.com/NewYorkInitiative)The exploration of these characters shows that they are not mentally unstable as one might assume, but rather misguided in their perception of themselves in their superhero roles. Yes they do good, and this fact is evident in this film, but their work also can put them in danger against better equipped criminals that they chase down. They become obsessive in nature toward finding crime to fight. Their hobby becomes their life.


Visually, this film does a great job of connecting a theme throughout. It doesn't make fun of the heroes, and it doesn't make them seem like hero vigilantes either. It merely shows them for who they are which is all a documentary should do. The graphics used are really fantastic. To tell some of the storylines and recounted stories, comic book style pictures and graphics were brought in to help cement the theme. Overall this film is a capture of a culture that is often thought of as unreal or passed over.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Stream of the Week- Daddy Day Care

Nothing could possibly go wrong when you have Eddie Murphy babysitting your children. I mean he's a complete professional.


Charlie and Phil are two dads who have just been laid off from their fancy marketing jobs and are now forced to not only look for work, but take care of their children while their wives go back into the workforce. When they find they cannot afford the pricey expense of professional child care, they decide to start their own day care to rival the preppy preschool known as Chapman Academy. They have trouble from the very beginning as they learn that they in fact know nothing about their children or how to take care of other people's kids. Along the way they pick up large numbers of students from Chapman wedging a spike of competition between the two care facilities. Chapman headmasters play dirty in hopes of making Daddy Day Care dissolve.


There are some familiar faces in this cast. The obivious players like Eddie Murphy and Jeff Garlin are a hoot as Charlie and Phil. They have great over-dramatic facial expressions which help carry the scenes. If you look at the kids, you'll see Elle Fanning and Jimmy Bennett (Star Trek 2009). The casting was filled with fun people who could easily play off the energy presented by the kids in the film. The plot is developed well enough for a comedy and is family friendly. This film is something that I used to watch with my family 5 years ago, and now everyone can revisit it on instant streaming.


This movie would go well for a marathon of funny family films. Movies like the Ernest series or Are We There Yet? Here are some other streaming films that would go well with this movie- Cheaper by the Dozen (original), Dr. Doolittle, Good Boy, Honey We Shrunk Ourselves, and Stuart Little. All of these films are available (currently) on Netflix instant streaming. It's always fun to go back and watch the films you used to like when you were younger just to see what you used to like. Try it.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Godzilla

It's the classic story of Japan vs. Monster come back to life. Godzilla returns to screens in this 2014 update of the classic monster movie.



During the 1950s, Americans tested nuclear bombs in the oceans to form new weapon technology. That is what the people were told at least. Those tests were actually attempts to rid the world of a giant monster-like entity known as Godzilla. In the 1990s, a huge creature that fed off of radiation wormed its way into a nuclear power plant in Japan. It then hatched in 2014. Godzilla picked up on the vibrations and calls of this creature and was drawn to kill it. The emergence of these creatures leads to widespread panic as the creatures battle it out in locations like Japan, Hawaii, and San Francisco. A lead scientist for the MONARCH group is attempting to find Godzilla and understand its being, while the government sees Godzilla as a hazard along with the parasite beasts that it fights and attempts to kill it with nuclear force. The government attempts, however, fall flat as their best men and women are killed by the ongoing battle of the beasts. In the end only the monster Godzilla can protect the people from the parasitic enemies of the olden days.


I had never seen the original Godzilla movies, whether that be the Japan makes or the pop American remakes, and I was unfamiliar with the storyline in general. Going in, however, I had assumed that Godzilla was the bad guy. In a monster movie, it seems to be general practice that the "monster" kills people and causes panic. In this adaptation, Godzilla is the protector of the people as he is really the only one fully equipped to kill the "bad guy" parasite monsters. This being said, he was probably the strongest character in the film. Ford Brody, the main human character, was the standard, cookie-cutter action film good guy with muscles, an army status, and purpose. His family was in danger with the beasts on the loose, and both his parents were causalities of the parasite monster eruptions. His drive is brought on by their deaths and endangerments bringing him into the epicenter of the fight with a nuclear bomb and the know-how to use it. However, his life is ultimately saved by Godzilla because he is not powerful enough to kill the beasts. Godzilla for the win.



The best line in this movie states the direct meaning of the film. "The arrogance of men is thinking nature is in their control and not the other way around. Let them fight." This statement, made by scientist Dr. Serizawa, lets the audience know that man is to blame for the emergence of these creatures. Much like every other "man is bad" film, nature does much better solving its issues on its own without the technology and weaponry of man. This is why Godzilla is the hero. The filmmakers and writers wanted to make a statement. Political and social culture statements do not really belong in between a Godzilla vs. Parasite scene and a Train vs. Parasite scene. But that's just my opinion.


What this movie did have subtle hints of was references to other films and scenes within the movie. The opening sequence in the Philippines is reminiscent of the introduction of the science crew in Jurassic Park. The helicopter flies over the water and lands in a ravine where they are greeted as doctors as they duck past the helicopter blades and get to work. There is also a scene in Hawaii where Ford Brody is trapped on a train track with a little Japanese child. This kid looks exactly like Short Round from Indiana Jones. The Godzilla voice, if you will, is very much a T-rex roar from Jurassic Park, and the sound effects themselves have the iconic Inception "da" sound that has been used in every trailer since Nolan used it.


The effects were modern and for the most part well used. The acting was subpar, and the plot was sketchy. However, for a monster movie "summer spectacular" it wasn't terrible. It is what we have come to expect from this genre. I would like to be wowed by films like this, but they rely heavily on special effects and graphics to carry their story, rather than compelling plots and acting.